Thank you for your interest in Surgery by Dana Schutz.
If you want to use your iPhone or iTouch to use these materials click here.
I want you to be an active participant in learning about this painting.
Please view the image on this page and click on the Comment button at the bottom-center of the painting. You can either type or record your reaction (if you have a microphone). When done, save/submit your comment and proceed to the next blog entry.
Thank you!
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Surgery by Dana Schutz
Surgery, Dana Schutz (2004)
Are little girls all made of sugar and spice and everything nice?As you'll discover in this painting, the truth is laid out a bit differently. The complexities of who we are is the basis of Women and Gender Studies at JCCC. And perhaps there is no better place to reinforce that than the painting Surgery at the Nerman Museum of Art by Dana Schutz.
Theresa Bembnister of Pitch Weekly wrote shortly after Bruce Hartman acquired the work:
"Surgery is a creepily spectacular commentary on the meanness of little girls. Seven of them gather around what resembles an oversized Operation game board there's a glassy-eyed little girl lying exposed on the examination table.
The top of her skull has been sliced cleanly off, her limbs lie across the table bent at awkward angles and her chest is an open cavity. Three of the girls lean over their specimen, picking at her with instruments in their gloved hands. The happy-colored palette -- girly pinks, comforting yellows and warm oranges -- and the checkered picnic tablecloth make for a pleasant backdrop.
But they're in stark contrast to the emotionless, calculating expressions on the girls' faces".
Major Influences on Schutz
Entry of Christ into Brussels (1888)
Schutz's artistic influences can be described as Post-Impressionist. Schutz has been referred to as:
The "Ensor on vacation in Tahiti with Gauguin."
James Ensor, a Belgium artist (1860 - 1949), was a major figure in the Belgian avant-garde of the late nineteenth century and an important precursor to the development of Expressionism in the early twentieth century. Ensor's look at modernity was through his innovative and allegorical use of light, his prominent use of satire, his deep interest in carnival and performance, and his own self-fashioning and use of masking, travesty, and role-playing.
(http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2009/ensor/#/intro/)
Influences - cont.
Where Do We Come From? What are We? Where are we Going? Paul Gauguin
Paul Gauguin (the post-impressionist) is known for his use of color -- themes of primitivism and Symbolism (Symbolism in painting -- to exaggerate, attenuate or deform an object's qualities not merely in furtherance of the artist’s individual vision but in service of the "needs of the idea to be expressed.").
Artistic Representation
Depth is created by Schutz's use of color.
- Painting as sculpture: "I often think of painting as building, like I'm building the space". The paint sometimes grows out of the canvas as the artist builds up in relief thick layers of paint. In other instances, she projects blobs of saturated paint onto the surface that disrupt the imagery and emphasize the surface plane, or add another level to the pictorial space.
- Art depicting humor, as seen in her various art pieces: Her tropical cannibals, choppy surgeons, paranoid patients, and self-devouring figures
- Child playing as a creator... Whimsical. Free of adult vengeance? Imaginary story telling
My Interpretations
For example, her character in another work, Twin Parts (at right), pictured in the process of building itself from spare body parts (or taking itself apart) seems engaged in a painterly process -- building an image to portray the self. (The construction of the art process).
- That construction metaphor also hints at the way we interact with one another and the commercial world
- The Man-eaters (series) with works such as The Reformers (2003) are not portraits of men and women consumed with self-loathing. Rather, they are Schutz's vision of a self-sufficient race -- they eat themselves, and rebuild themselves out of their own feces. The question is raised as to why do they need to rebuild themselves?
- For example, in The Autopsy of Michael Jackson (2005) while we all know of the artistic construction and reconstruction of the man himself, did his obsession over body image lead to construction or deconstruction. Timely piece.
- This theme of interaction and commercialization is a theme also put forward in her paintings of "Self-eaters."
AND no doubt, our focus today on Surgery . While critics don’t necessarily see as a central component to her work, there is a current of feminist criticism in Schutz's treatment of “our bodies and ourselves.”
What intrigues me most about this painting are it's psychological, sociological and socio-political / feminist perspective implications.
Psychological Interpretations
A painting is a visual representation of not only the artist’s external experience, but it is also a reflection of the artist’s inner thoughts as well. Thus the science of psychology can help us understand what the artist may be communicating through there work.
Here are some of my thoughts in a psychological interpretation of Surgery.
Here are some of my thoughts in a psychological interpretation of Surgery.
- Is it to be expected that elementary school-age developmentally-speaking girls, go through a "mean" stage? Is bullying a reflection of in-group and/or out-group attributions?
- Innocent play leads to destructive outlets -- expressions of our internal instincts? Freudian?
- Extending the Freudian interpretation, are these young girls experiencing dissociation—angst over their own bodies, or more so, the formation of identity (Oh at such a young age) lending to their lack of emotions. Psychologically relieving their anxiety through acts without emotions - a defense mechanism of displacement? (Schutz is one hundred percent present (in her paintings), asserting the conditions of anxiety - extremes of abandonment, loathing of various kinds, and dismemberment - as if they were displays in a theme park (Free Times, 2006). Is their emotional void a defense mechanism towards their primitive actions?
- Sticking with a developmental stage theory perspective, Erikson’s industry stage comes to mind. Through their actions (of surgery -- cutting up and then sewing back up), are they avoiding an individual sense of inferiority?
- From the social psychology literature, could group conformity lead to sense of being anonymous. Though one sees differences between the girls (e.g., ethnicity and religion), there is something very similar in look between them—leading to sense of being anonymous, and as such, destructive acts.
- Assumption here is that the mean-ness lies within the individual, there is no context generating the behaviors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)